01.07.2020

Webinar 23.-25. September: DNA in police work: New methods, new challenges?

 

Pictures taken from the artist Heather Dewey-Hagborg´s work «Stranger visions». With kind permission from the artist.*

New methods for using DNA in police work: What are the technical, legal and ethical challenges?

Dates: Wednesday 23, Thursday 24, Friday 25 September (for times, see below)
Place: Online
OrganizersThe Nordic Committee on Bioethics and  The Norwegian Biotechnology Advisory Board

This is a public event and free of charge. Please register in advance (link to come). 

 

In the mid-1980s, a method for identifying individuals through DNA analysis was invented. Today, DNA fingerprinting is used all over the world in cases involving criminal activity and missing persons.

These tests use part of the DNA, previously known as junk DNA, that don’t code for actual characteristics in people. This has been viewed as a strength of the method in light of privacy considerations.

However, in recent years new methods for using DNA in police work have been developed. We now have the ability to search for a partial match of a DNA profile and identify potential family members, whether in police or private ancestry databases. Another method, known as DNA phenotyping, involves genetic testing that can provide information about what an unknown suspect might look like. This method may be useful when there is no matching DNA profile in the databases.

Both methods have been used to help solve cases. In Europe, however, only a few countries have amended its legislation to allowed new uses of DNA testing. In many countries the legal framework is uncertain.

The use of new DNA methods raises questions relating to technology, legal framework and ethics.

We will focus on the ethics of the subject and have invited people with different backgrounds to discuss topics such as:

  • Which challenges are well known from police work today and which are new?
  • Regulation and practice in the Nordics and in Europe
  • Privacy and genetic integrity
  • Profiling and discrimination: Is this technology neutral or are there embedded biases?
  • The ethics of visual representations: Are visual traits less stigmatising? Or the opposite?
  • Technologisation: A space left for human judgment?
  • Good and bad practice: The ethics of context and communication

Programme

Wednesday 23, 11AM-13.15 PM (Oslo time): Talks followed by Q&A

Thursday 24, 11AM-13.30 PM (Oslo time): Talks followed by Q&A

Friday 25, 11AM-12.30 PM (Oslo time). DNA in police work. Roundtable discussion

Speakers

Thomas Berg, Centre for forensic science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Nicolaj Sivan Holst, Faculty of Law, Aarhus

Mareile Kaufman, Peace Research Institute Oslo; Department of criminology and sociology of law, University of Oslo

Jari Louhelainen, Biochemistry, University of Helsinki, Faculty of Science, University of Liverpool

Amade M´charek, prof. of Anthropology of science, University of Amsterdam

Jens Erik Paulsen, The Norwegian Police University College, Oslo

Gabrielle Samuel, Kings college London

Björgvin Sigurðsson, Forensic specialist at the Crime Scene Unit of the Reykjavík Metropolitan Police, Reykjavik

Andreas Tillmar, University of Linköping, Sweden

Turid Haugen Tor, The National Criminal Investigation Service Norway

Victor Toom, independent

Matthias Wienroth, Centre for Crime & Policing, Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, UK

 

Contact:

Truls Petersen: +47 97088101 / truls.petersen@bioteknologiradet.no
Madeleine Hayenhjelm: madeleine.hayenhjelm@umu.se
Sigurður Kristinsson: sigkr@unak.is

 

* In her work «Stranger Visions» the artist Heather Dewey-Hagborg collected hairs, chewed up gum, and cigarette butts from the streets, public bathrooms and waiting rooms of New York City. After extracting DNA from them she made portraits representing what those individuals might look like, based on genomic research. Read more about the project here.

An article in norwegian about her work can be read here.

 

 

logo bioteknologirådet  

Siden ble opprettet: 01.07.2020. Siden ble oppdatert: 10.08.2020

Relevante temasider

Flere nyheter

Ny episode av Biotekpodden

03.08.2020

I den siste utgaven av Biotekpodden snakker Liv.. Les mer »

Genteknologiloven i endring

26.06.2020

Reglene for GMO-legemidler og en mulighet for å.. Les mer »

Bioteknologiloven – hva ble endret?

25.06.2020

Mange og store endringer ble vedtatt da Stortinget.. Les mer »

Kan granlaksen erstatte soyalaksen? Webinar i to deler

22.06.2020

Hvor viktig er bioteknologi for det grønne skiftet?.. Les mer »

Biotekpodden – en podcast om bioteknologi

30.05.2020

Bioteknologien utvikler seg raskt, noe som skaper nye.. Les mer »

– Norge har fått en ny, modernisert bioteknologilov

26.05.2020

– Bioteknologirådet har evaluert bioteknologiloven og har sett.. Les mer »

I GENialt: Ønskjer du deg eit sjølvlysande juletre?

19.05.2020

Då må du nok smøre deg med tolmod… Les mer »

I GENialt: Cellefabrikker som lager rullebaner, medisiner og mat

19.05.2020

Bakterier og sopp er arbeidere som jobber døgnet.. Les mer »

I GENialt: Hva vet vi om helserisiko for barna etter assistert befruktning?

19.05.2020

Stortinget skal snart vedta endringer i bioteknologiloven. En.. Les mer »

I GENialt: Eggdonasjon og assistert befruktning til enslige – hva står på spill?

19.05.2020

Bioteknologiloven er i endring. Snart skal stortingspolitikerne si.. Les mer »

© 2020 Bioteknologirådet. | Design: Tank - Utviklet av: Spekter